HR: 1340h
AN: U43C-1409 [Abstracts]
TI: Policy Needs for Carbon Capture & Storage
AU: * Peridas, G
EM: gperidas@nrdc.org
AF: Natural Resources Defense Council, 1200 New York Ave NW,
Suite 400, Washington, DC 20005,
AB:
Climate change is one of the most pressing environmental problems of our time. The widespread consensus
that exists on climate science requires deep cuts in greenhouse gas emissions, on the order of 50-80% globally
from current levels. Reducing energy demand, increasing energy efficiency and sourcing our energy from
renewable sources will, and should, play a key role in achieving these cuts. Fossil fuels however are abundant,
relatively inexpensive, and still make up the backbone of our energy system. Phasing out fossil fuel use will be a
gradual process, and is likely to take far longer than the timeframe dictated by climate science for reducing
emissions. A reliable way of decarbonizing the use of fossil fuels is needed. Carbon capture and storage (CCS)
has already proven to be a technology that can safely and effectively accomplish this task. The technological
know-how and the underground capacity exist to store billions of tons of carbon dioxide in mature oil and gas
fields, and deep saline formations. Three large international commercial projects and several other applications
have proved this, but substantial barriers remain to be overcome before CCS becomes the technology of choice
in all major emitting sectors. Government has a significant role to play in surmounting these barriers. Without
mandatory limits on greenhouse gas emissions and a price on carbon, CCS is likely to linger in the background.
The expected initial carbon price levels and their potential volatility under such a scheme dictates that further
policies be used in the early years in order for CCS to be implemented. Such policies could include a new source
performance standard for power plants, and a low carbon generation obligation that would relieve first movers by
spreading the additional cost of the technology over entire sectors. A tax credit for capturing and permanently
sequestering anthropogenic CO2 would aid project economics. Assistance in the form of loan guarantees for
components of the technology that make financing problematic due to insufficient performance guarantees would
help first movers. The development of a pipeline network for transporting CO2 will require centralized planning in
order to materialize and make use of economies of scale. The federal government should significantly accelerate
its research, development and demonstration program, with particular emphasis on multi-megaton injections in
representative geological settings. Finally, a comprehensive regulatory framework for large-scale injections is a
high priority item that can and should be developed now, with scope for revision after our experience with CCS
projects grows.
DE: 6615 Legislation and regulations (6324)
SC: Union [U]
MN: 2007 Fall Meeting