HR: 10:20h
AN: A52A-01 INVITED [Abstracts]
TI: Global trends in visibility: implications for dust sources
AU: * Mahowald, N
EM: mahowald@ucar.edu
AF: NCAR, 1850 Table Mesa Dr., Boulder, CO 80307, United States
AU: Ballantine, J A
EM: andyb@bren.ucsb.edu
AF: ICESS, UCSB, Santa Barbara, CA , United States
AU: Feddema, J
EM: feddema@ku.edu
AF: Department of Geography, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS , United States
AU: Ramankutty, N
EM: navin.ramankutty@mcgill.ca
AF: Department of Geography, McGill University, Montreal, QU , Canada
AB:
There is a large uncertainty in the relative roles of human land use, climate change and carbon dioxide fertilization
in changing desert dust source strength over the past 100 years, and the overall sign of human impacts on dust
is not known. We used visibility data from meteorological stations in dusty regions to assess the anthropogenic
impact on long term trends in desert dust emissions. Visibility data are available at thousands of stations globally
from 1900 to the present, but we focused on 359 stations with more than 30 years of data in regions where
mineral aerosols play a dominant role in visibility observations. We evaluated the 1974 to 2003 time period
because most of these stations have reliable records only during this time. We first evaluated the visibility data
against AERONET aerosol optical depth data, and found that only in dusty regions are the two moderately
correlated. Correlation coefficients between visibility derived variables and AERONET optical depths indicate a
moderate correlation (~0.47), consistent with capturing about 20% of the variability in optical depths. Two visibility
derived variables appear to compare the best with AERONET observations: the fraction of observations with
visibility less than 5km (VIS5) and the surface extinction (EXT). Regional trends show that in many dusty places,
VIS5 and EXT are statistically significantly correlated with the palmer drought severity index (based on
precipitation and temperature) or surface wind speeds, consistent with dust temporal variability being largely
driven by meteorology. This is especially true for North African and Chinese dust sources, but less true in the
Middle East, Australia or South America, where there are not consistent patterns in the correlations. Climate
indices such as El Nino or the North Atlantic Oscillation are not correlated with visibility derived variables in this
analysis. There are few stations where visibility measures are correlated with cultivation or grazing estimates on
a temporal basis, although this may be a function of the very coarse temporal resolution of the land use datasets.
On the other hand, spatial analysis of the visibility data suggests that natural topographic lows are not correlated
with visibility, but land use is correlated at a moderate level. This analysis is consistent with land use being
important in some regions, but meteorology driving interannual variability during 1974-2003.
DE: 0305 Aerosols and particles (0345, 4801, 4906)
DE: 0315 Biosphere/atmosphere interactions (0426, 1610)
SC: Atmospheric Sciences [A]
MN: 2007 Joint Assembly