HR: 1400h
AN: OS23B-18    [Abstracts]
TI: Ecological estimation of the possible variants new Ukrainian shipping way between the Danube and the Black Sea
AU: * Berlinsky, N
EM: ibss@paco.net
AF: Odessa Branch, Institute of Biology of Southern Seas, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, 37 Pushkinskaya St, Odessa, 65125, Ukraine
AB: The better way or optimal variant means economic advisability of organization and using the way and the same time minimization of anthropogenic press. The first problem's factor is - all kinds' variants cross the area of the Danube Biosphere Reserve. The next factor is - all kinds of variants need dredging works in the sea shallow water so called bar's zone for marine entrance channel. As for natural factors there are also two. The first one is a long term delta evolution and the second is the process of water discharge redistribution. If the human influence to the first factor is still limited the second factor's influence can be unlimited - it is easy to do by jetty or dams construction. At present there are nine possible variants of the DWW: Variant 1. It is an artificial canal built as an ameliorative at 80-s between the Danube and Sasik liman. It provokes the water discharge redistribution up on 16.6% from the Danube run off (from the total Q=3000 m3/c for 54 km), hydrological regime in Ukrainian delta and ecological conditions will be sharply worsened. This project supposed a giant dredging works. Variant 2. The Project of engineer P.S. Chekhovich (1904). The length of the canal is 10 km. (The problems are: it is an artificial canal, needs the bridge, cross the wetlands area, redistribute water discharge from the Danube). Variant 3. Solomonov branch - Zhebryany bay modern Project by engineer V.P. Zizak (2000), The problems are: it is an artificial canal also, but with locks, needs the bridge, to cross the wetlands area, the water discharge redistribution from the Danube up on 2.27% (from the total Q=3000 m3/c for 54 km). The length of the canal is 9 km. Two last variants have orientation from Solomonov arm to Zhebriany bay. The other variants of DWW linked with Ochakovsky and Starostambulsky arms systems. Ochakosky system is dying off system from geological point of view. There are two arms which can be examined for DWW - Prorva arm and Potapovo arm. Besides, Ochakovska system needs dykes along both of shores but its construction may have strong influence on ecosystem. The second variant in this system is Potapovo DWW. So, all problems with dyke constructions are continuing besides this DWW passes through the one of the Strict Protection UNESCO zone in Biosphere Reserve, so call iadro. For fundamental reconstruction of Ochakovska system it is necessary to redistribute water discharge in the inner delta. It means to construct the dam in Starostambulsky system and redistribute water to Ochakovska system. In this case ecological situation in Starostambulsky system will be catastrophic. Hydrology regime modification influences the animal and plant kingdom. In the Starostambulsy mouth there is also the Strict Protection UNESCO zone in Biosphere Reserve. All kinds of alternative variants of DWW are dangerous for ecological condition of Chilia delta because considerable part of fresh water will be withdrawn from Ukrainian part of delta (upper 20 km) and it will provoke degradation of living condition for water plants and animals in the delta and Biosphere reserve including. The other Projects are directly linked with strong influence on the zones under strict protection (UNESCO) in the Danube Biosphere reserve. So, safest project is Bystryy DWW, because its conditions created by nature itself and don't need additional artificial constructions. Ukrainian DWW in Starostambulsky arm can be the reason of ecological and economic problems for Romanian side (silting of Sulina DWW).
DE: 4815 Ecosystems, structure, dynamics, and modeling (0439)
SC: Ocean Sciences [OS]
MN: 2007 Joint Assembly