HR: 14:22h
AN: SM53C-02 INVITED [Abstracts]
TI: Anti-parallel and Component Reconnection at the Magnetopause
AU: * Trattner, K J
EM: trattner@spasci.com
AF: Lockheed Martin ATC, 3251 Hanover Str., B255, ADCS, Palo Alto, CA 94304-1191, United
States
AU: Mulcock, J S
EM: jmulcock@musd.org
AF: Lockheed Martin ATC, 3251 Hanover Str., B255, ADCS, Palo Alto, CA 94304-1191, United
States
AU: Petrinec, S M
EM: petrinec@spasci.com
AF: Lockheed Martin ATC, 3251 Hanover Str., B255, ADCS, Palo Alto, CA 94304-1191, United
States
AU: Fuselier, S A
EM: fuselier@spasci.com
AF: Lockheed Martin ATC, 3251 Hanover Str., B255, ADCS, Palo Alto, CA 94304-1191, United
States
AB:
Reconnection at the magnetopause is clearly the dominant mechanism by which magnetic fields in different
regions change topology to create open magnetic field lines that allow energy and momentum to flow into the
magnetosphere. Observations and data analysis methods have reached the maturity to address one of the
major outstanding questions about magnetic reconnection: The location of the reconnection site. There are two
scenarios discussed in the literature, a) anti-parallel reconnection where shear angles between the
magnetospheric field and the IMF are near 180 degrees, and b) component reconnection where shear angles are
as low as 50 degrees. One popular component reconnection model is the tilted neutral line model. Both
reconnection scenarios have a profound impact on the location of the X-line and plasma transfer into the
magnetosphere.
We have analyzed 3D plasma measurements observed by the Polar satellite in the northern hemisphere cusp
region during southward IMF conditions. These 3D plasma measurements are used to estimate the distance to
the reconnection line by using the low-velocity cutoff technique for precipitating and mirrored magnetosheath
populations in the cusp. The calculated distances are subsequently traced back along geomagnetic field lines to
the expected reconnection sites at the magnetopause. The Polar survey of northern cusp passes reveal that both
reconnection scenarios occur at the magnetopause. The IMF clock angle appears to be the dominant parameter
in causing either the anti-parallel or the tilted X-line reconnection scenario.
DE: 2706 Cusp
DE: 2716 Energetic particles: precipitating
DE: 2723 Magnetic reconnection (7526, 7835)
DE: 2724 Magnetopause and boundary layers
SC: SPA-Magnetospheric Physics [SM]
MN: 2007 Joint Assembly