HR: 16:35h
AN: V34A-02    [Abstracts]
TI: The Summer 2006 Volcanic Crisis of Tungurahua, Ecuador: No Lessons Learned
AU: * Toulkeridis, T
EM: theofilost@usfq.edu.ec
AF: Center of Geology, Volcanology and Geodynamics, Universidad San Francisco de Quito, Via Interoceanica y Jardines del Este, Quito, 17-12-841, Ecuador
AB: More than 250 volcanoes are exposed in the Ecuadorian part of the Northern Andean Volcanic Zone of which the 5019 m a.s.l. high Tungurahua, is one of the seventeen considered active volcanoes in the country. The Tungurahua volcanic complex is located in the Eastern metamorphic belt and is made up of three different edifices. The actual active stratovolcano, Tungurahua III, is build up above debris-avalanche deposits of the last sector collapse and contains also series of lavas of either andesitic affinities, which reached in past VEI's of 3 while the occasionally dacitic lavas have been associated with eruptive phases reaching VEI's of up to 4. The growth of the steep-sided volcano is based on eruptive phases with the repeated generation of ash falls, lahars, lava and pyroclastic flows demonstrating a frequency of approximate once per century, lasting each up to a decade. The volcano remained relatively dormant until 1993 when seismic activity gradually increased, while in August of 1999 after some 80 years of rest, Tungurahua III entered into a new eruptive phase lasting up to date, now eight years of continuous activity. The new magmatic, andesitic activity was characterized mainly by strombolian types of explosions, gas, ash and tephra emissions covering usually the southwestern area of the volcano and occasionally minor lahars due to the accumulation of ash on the flanks of the volcano. Since the beginning of the new eruptive activity in late 1999, the volcano exhibited different eruptive cycles, usually every 12 to 18 months up to the spring-summer of 2006. Between the 10th to the 16th of May a new eruptive cycle started with the usual ash showers due to the high frequency of phreatic and strombolian explosions of which one reached a height of 19km. Shortly later after an apparent calmness, a 15 km high eruptive column produced the very first pyroclastic flows (and minor lava flows), which descended on the western volcanic flank reaching small villages. About a month later, the strongest eruption since the reactivation of Tungurahua in 1999, with a VEI of 3, produced some 20 pyroclastic flows, which covered a big part of the western volcanic flank, killing seven persons in a previously stated safe zone and devastating at least five small villages, destroying some 20,000 hectars of cultivated land. This eruption of the 16th to the 17th of August of 2006, which had a very high social and economic impact, covered a huge area of Ecuador of which ash and gas clouds reached a length of at least 800 km and a width of some 200 km mainly towards the western side of the volcano. Since 1999 as result of the volcanic activity, authorities changed frequently the alert levels between yellow, moderate orange and orange, which leaded to one evacuation of some 26,000 persons from the foothill-situated, but due natural barriers protected city of Banios and some other nearby minor villages in the volcano area in October 1999. Due to the failed prediction of a major event, people went back violently three months later despite the orders of the authorities. Later in 2006 due to the presence of the first pyroclastic flows, a few hundred people fled from their homes situated in the western flank of the volcano and after the eruption of the 16th to the 17th of August 2006, some 5,000 people of the same area fled or were evacuated into refuge camps in the surrounding of the volcano. Promised and assured financial assistance by different ministries for the relocation of the public, never reached the affected families. New previously unpublished photographic and video material as well as statistics of the interviewed, affected public will be shown within this presentation.
DE: 8488 Volcanic hazards and risks
SC: Volcanology, Geochemistry, and Petrology [V]
MN: 2007 Joint Assembly