From majordom@mbari.org Thu Jun  1 18:48 PDT 1995
Received: from wave.mbari.org by barnacle.mbari.org with ESMTP
	(1.37.109.16/16.2) id AA050637731; Thu, 1 Jun 1995 18:48:52 -0700
Return-Path: <majordom@mbari.org>
Received: by wave.mbari.org
	($Revision: 1.37.109.26 $/16.2) id AA240187724; Thu, 1 Jun 1995 21:48:44 -0400
Received: from reef.mbari.org by wave.mbari.org with ESMTP
	($Revision: 1.37.109.26 $/16.2) id AA239807716; Thu, 1 Jun 1995 18:48:36 -0700
Received: by reef.mbari.org
	(1.37.109.16/16.2) id AA199927715; Thu, 1 Jun 1995 18:48:35 -0700
From: Ed Mellinger <meed@mbari.org>
Subject: AC Thermal Test Results
To: neji@wave.mbari.org (Jim Newman)
Date: Thu, 1 Jun 95 18:48:34 PDT
Cc: meed@wave.mbari.org (Ed Mellinger), rovtech@wave.mbari.org
Mailer: Elm [revision: 70.85]
Sender: owner-rovtech@mbari.org
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

Hi Jim -

Just completed thermal testing of AC Power Can.  This involved short
circuiting one 240V output and applying full input current at much
reduced voltage using a 60 Hz three phase variac.  (Full power to one
240V output is the worst case thermal condition.)  This test duplicates
all losses experienced during full voltage operation except for
transformer core excitation losses which are about 15% of the total.

Testing was performed at 100% and 133% of nominal 75 A full load current
(100% and 170% of nominal 800 W full load losses), with the can tilted 
5 degrees either way in pitch and roll, and over the 40-56V range of
the 48V supply.  Test duration was limited to 1 hour at 100% current and
30 minutes at 133% current by inadequate cooling of the outside of
the aluminum power can, and an arbitrary Fluorinert temperature
limit of 60 C.  Four runs were made at 100% and two at 133% current.

The tests were generally successful, with comments as noted below:

1)  Cooling of all components was adequate at all power levels tested.
FC-72 (Fluorinert) temperature was estimated from absolute pressure and
was within 5 C of can wall temperature at all power levels.  Average
copper temperature was estimated from resistance rise and was within 
10 C of FC-72 temperature at all power levels.  Rectifier heatsink
temperature rise was measured directly with a thermocouple and was 
within 20-30 C of FC-72 temperature depending on absolute temperature 
and power levels.

2)  FC-72 boiling characteristics were satisfactory, ranging from
moderate to vigorous depending on power level.  FC-72 boil-over varied
from zero to minor depending on power level (boiling intensity) and 
temperature (thermal expansion).  Boilover actually aided rectifier
cooling at max power and temperature (prompting me to claim it as a
feature...).

3)  Pumps and controls performed adequately either singly or in
combination under all conditions tested, including boilover plus 
170% thermal load.  The only exception was a vapor lock in
one pump during one tilt transition, which required a power cycle 
to clear.  

4)  All components remained adequately submerged under FC-72 during all
conditions of tilt.  The FC-72 level sensors performed as expected and
were usable for determining proper fill levels as well as loss of
coolant, at all temperatures and supply voltages.  However changes will
need to be made to the "warning" threshold in the AC micro, and the
"alarm" condition should occur only when *both* sensors reach the
warning threshold.

5)  At 100% load the tank boils from full to the low limit (components
exposed) in about four minutes, faster than I expected.

6)  FC-72 fill quantity in the prototype power can was 5.75 liters (or
9.7 kg), larger than the originally estimated 6 kg.  (This is partly due
to the transformers being smaller than expected, and could be partly
compensated by adding plastic filler inside the transformer tank when
the final transformers are installed.)  FC-72 fill by vacuum backfill,
and drain by siphon, were both successful and required 15-20 minutes
each way.   Drain is improved by 1-2 degrees of tilt (roll) during
drain.  Approximately 0.4 liters were lost to evaporation, retention
in sump, transformer windings, etc.

7.  Transformer tank contamination by grease or other solubles 
continues to be a concern.  If we limit the AC Can's o-ring grease to
DC-4 (silicone) this should only be a nuisance; I will make further
hipot tests to ensure that the transformer isolation remains intact.

This completes thermal testing, about 5 weeks behind schedule.  There
are a few mechanical fixes to make and the new centerwall to wire, after
which I will go on to full voltage/full power testing.

-Ed 



in transformer windings, etc.   

 

